(no subject)
Oct. 31st, 2017 07:49 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
leblonWe know now that an advisor for the Trump campaign has communicated in the spring of 2016 with a Russian intelligence agent, was promised "dirt on Hillary" in the form of "thousands of emails", and got commended for his work by a senior campaign official. And all of this happened before anyone else knew about DNC hacks. Does this qualify as evidence of collusion? If not, why not?
